As Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki prepares to make a third run in the Iraq’s upcoming parliamentary elections, daunting challenges appear ahead. More than ever, Maliki stands as a dividing figure in Iraqi politics—his opponents are numerous and diverse, but the strongest opposition, political and religious, comes from within his Shia community.
There have been indications that Iraq’s Shia spiritual leader Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani is not in favor of a third term for Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki, but the latter is taking advantage of the Ayatollah’s quietism. Although Maliki seems aware of Sistani’s disproval of his performance, he is using Sistani’s abstention from politics (Sistani will not even meet with politicians) to deny claims that he lost the support of the religious establishment. Sistani belongs to and maintains the traditional Shii thought that a marja’s role in politics is limited to providing advice without taking sides, unless the Islamic social identity of society comes under a threat—which necessitated his involvement in the ratification of the 2005 constitution. However, Sistani’s representatives have, without explicitly naming Maliki, made their discontent with him and his performance apparent, especially on issues of national unity and security (including his handling of Sunni protests and poor management of security challenges, let alone corruption). These criticisms are effectively delivered through Friday prayer, in a soft manner and in compliance with Sistani’s approach.
Iran played a decisive role in helping Maliki cinch a second term in 2010 when he needed Sadrists’ votes. Shortly thereafter, the leader of the Sadrists, Muqtada Al-Sadr, declared that Iran forced him to vote for Maliki. Observers believe that the second term of Maliki has revived sectarianism, weakened national unity, and barred independent institutions from power. In this context, the only internal Iraqi actor capable of resisting Iranian hegemony is the Iraqi Shia religious establishment, namely the hawza (seminary) of Najaf, and its supreme marjaAyatollah Sistani. Furthermore, this institution can cast doubts on Tehran’s religious legitimacy in the eyes of Iraq’s Shia. However, the Shia establishment’s quietism stands in the way of allowing it to counter Iranian influence, and therefore Sistani’s role in balancing out Tehran’s influence in Iraq will remain marginal in the short run.
At the moment, however, Iran is likely to wait for the results of 2014 elections to decide whom to support. With the Iranian economy in crisis, impacted by sanctions, Tehran will not spend resources on supporting specific individuals, even if they are allies, during their pre-election campaigns. Maliki’s major electoral threat comes from within his own sectarian-based constituency, namely from the Sadrists and the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI). The last two parliamentary and local elections, in which the State of Law coalition (Maliki’s bloc) was unable to gain the majority of seats, indicate that he would need additional support from other parties, perhaps even his rivals, in order to achieve re-election. Iran maintains good relations with practically all major Shia players (Da‘wa, ISCI, and the Sadrists). Wishing to maximize its gain, Iran is likely to wait and see if an anti-Maliki alliance develops and gains strengthen. If this alliance becomes threatening enough, Iran is likely to use it to gain greater concessions from Maliki for a promise and a push to bring him back to power.
Maliki’s chances at a third term depend largely on the electoral showing of his two Shii rivals, the Sadrists and ISCI, and their capacity to form an anti-Maliki alliance. However, in this case the Sadrists and ISCI lack the political clout to promote their own nominee to premiership, but an alliance between them would perhaps force Maliki’s bloc to nominate an alternative personality from within the Da‘wa Party. This seems to be the same possible outcome for which Sistani wishes; his preachers have been urging their followers not to vote for the “current corrupt officials,” a veiled reference to Maliki. The Sadrists and ISCI can use Sistani’s presumed dissatisfaction with Maliki to ensure the latter loses support. If they manage to achieve that, the Da‘wa Party may once again replace their candidate at the last moment, and say goodbye to Maliki for good.
This article is reprinted with permission from Sada. It can be accessed online at: http://carnegieendowment.org/sada/2013/12/18/maliki-s-troubles/gwns
Fadel Al-Kifaee is an Iraqi scholar and author of The Role of Najaf’s Hawza and Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani in Restructuring the Iraqi Governance System in Post-Baathist Iraq.