Hilary Clinton should stop lying

The BDS movement that includes divestment and boycott moves by leading American churches and European banks and even some governments is not trying to delegitimize Israel.

It is hard to think of two politicians in the world whose reputation for insincerity and political expediency is as high as American presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. So when they both read out of the same messaging book on international criticism of Israeli policies and boycott, divestment and sanctions moves against its colonization and subjugation of Palestinians, it probably means we should pay attention, because this is going to become a major media theme in the months ahead.

Sadly, but predictably, they both distort the truth about precisely why and how people, organizations and governments around the world increasingly criticize the illegal practices of the Israeli state, such as colonizing Palestinian lands. They unfortunately lie and distort when they claim the world and the Arabs seek to vilify Israel simply because it represents Jewish people, when the truth is that the world and the Arab governments are hard at work behind the scenes trying to find a way to relaunch the 2002 Arab Peace Plan that aims to achieve a permanent peace agreement with the state of Israel and all the millions of Jews it represents.

The Israeli government worked closely with major elements of the American political system in the past two years to try and block or significantly modify the current agreement being negotiated with Iran on nuclear issues and sanctions. That attempt seems to have failed, as a nuclear/sanctions agreement appears to be imminent, for which we should all give thanks. It is likely that Israel will now try to achieve the kinds of policy reversals with boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) moves around the world that it was not able to achieve on the Iran issue.

In most cases, the Israeli government and its parrot-like apologists and cheerleaders in the West, such as most American presidential candidates, try to frame the BDS movement as an anti-Semitic hate movement that dislikes Jews simply for being Jews, and wants to delegitimize and discredit Israel simply because it is Israel. Having failed to convince the world that Iran is as dangerous as Hitler, and that Hamas is as dangerous as al-Qaeda and Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), their focus now will include an attempt to portray BDS as a new form of anti-Semitic blind hatred that only seeks to destroy Israel and deny Jews anywhere a normal life.

The measurable, tangible impact of the BDS movement on Israel’s economy and wellbeing is not immense, but it is a reality. More importantly, it seems to be picking up momentum around the world, including in Europe and North America. Clinton and Netanyahu both speak out forcefully on this issue. Clinton earlier this week wrote to Haim Saban, a leading Jewish supporter of political causes in the United States, and criticized comparisons that are widely being made between Israel and the apartheid regime in South Africa. She sought to work with Saban and others to, “reverse this trend with information and advocacy, and fight back against further attempts to isolate and delegitimize Israel.”

She framed this within the context of what saw as anti-Semitism being on the rise around the world, and said this is the time “to repudiate forceful efforts to malign and undermine Israel and the Jewish people.”

Hillary Clinton should stop lying. The BDS movement that includes divestment and boycott moves by leading American churches and European banks and even some governments is not trying to delegitimize Israel; it is trying to stop Israel’s criminal, exploitative and oppressive behavior in occupied Palestinian lands, and against Palestinians inside Israel proper and in exile.

The Arab world, through its governments, has come to terms with the reality of Israel in the form of the 2002 Arab Peace Plan, and efforts continue behind the scenes to explore how to relaunch this initiative that offers Israel, Palestine and all Arab states the opportunity to coexist in peace and, more importantly, with equal rights. The BDS movement does not take a stand on these issues, but rather focuses on using legitimate, non-violent political pressure to curtail Israeli practices, such as colonial settlements, that are widely seen around the world as being contrary to international law and convention. This is the same approach that Israel and Clinton and pals have used for years to pressure Iran, for example, to comply with international conventions and UN resolutions.

When the same approach is applied to Israeli criminality, it is called anti-Semitism and an attempt to delegitimize Israel, which clearly it is not. The good news is that the Netanyahu-Clinton approach of using intimidation and accusations of anti-Semitism do not succeed any more, because the global momentum is moving towards the reasonable position that should be applied to all countries: support their right to exist in peace and security within their recognized borders, but oppose their criminal behavior against others that goes against prevailing global norms and laws. No country in the world, including Israel, should be exempt from this standard.

Rami G. Khouri is published twice weekly in the Daily Star. He was founding director and now senior policy fellow of the Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs at the American University of Beirut. On Twitter @ramikhouri.

Copyright ©2015 Rami G. Khouri — distributed by Agence Global

Related Posts

  • Palestinians Deserve Better than Netanyahu and AbbasPalestinians Deserve Better than Netanyahu and Abbas The behavior of the Israeli leadership is criminal. The behavior of the Palestinian leadership is incompetent. The Palestinian people deserve much better than this on both counts.
  • What Do We Learn from the Iran Deal?What Do We Learn from the Iran Deal? What lessons have we learned from the process behind getting the Iran deal through American congress? Perhaps not much new, but some clarity on old understandings of the relationship between the United States and Israel.
  • Narrow Ethno-nationalism Plagues All in the Middle EastNarrow Ethno-nationalism Plagues All in the Middle East The Middle East continues shifting toward increasingly narrow state identities and government policies that are defined by a combination of narrow ethnicity, increased militarism and religious conservatism.